Unhappy Lawyers

I have written about both the identity crisis lawyers face and the apparent widespread dissatisfaction on the part of many law school graduates with life in the law. These days, the discussion is a pretty hot one, given the current job market. Those of you interested in going to law school or those eager to cut and run, might have a look at these three interesting pieces:

A WSJ Law Blog piece featuring Monica Parker, who offers advice to The Unhappy Lawyer (her new book):

“A lot of us went to law school by default,” said Parker, when we asked her why she thinks lawyer-happiness is in such short supply. “We’re people who don’t quite know what we want to do, but think law school will create opportunities. So we get sucked into a funnel of going into a law firm, and then, there you are! You’re miserable. You’re miserable because you didn’t choose this career. It pretty much chose you. You were never taught how to select a career, think about the possibilities, how to experiment, how to learn about what’s important to you.”

Disatisfied with law practice and need to make some cash? Write a book about getting out.

Along the same lines, an earlier WSJ Law Blog piece about a "law school naysayer."

The Q&A is interesting. Again (see here and here, for example) the discussion highlights the problem of seeking a law degree primarily as a means to increased income.

Finally, Above the Law has an interesting series going on "Alternative Careers for Lawyers."

200 Accredited Law Schools: Too Many?

The ABA Journal.com reports that some are questioning the need for 200 ABA-accredited law schools. The discussion is in response to the accreditation of two new schools, Elon and Charlotte, which brought the number to 200.

Much of the discussion involves supply and demand issues. According to the Journal:

Law professor William Henderson of Indiana University warns that a law degree does not necessarily translate into high salaries. While top firms paid a median $145,000 in starting salaries last fall, overall the median salary for new lawyers was $62,000, according to figures from NALP.

''I think we have this fundamental disconnect between images of lawyers in the popular media, in the courtroom dispensing justice, where everyone seems prosperous and well paid,'' Henderson told AP. ''The reality is for a lot of people, law school is a route to trying to start your own private practice, and that's a very crowded business right now.''

I'm not sure I buy the "glut of law schools" argument. Recently, however, law schools have fashioned themselves more and more as technical academies for teaching "legal skills" and "techniques" for doing the legal thing. If all we're providing at law school is a vo-tech experience, then we need only enough student factories to fill open slots for legal technicians in the law factories. So maybe there is a glut.

On the other hand, there may be more to legal education than technical proficiency. One law professor put it this way:

[One] who aspires to a thorough acquaintance with legal science, should cultivate the most enlarged ideas of its transcendent dignity, its vital importance, its boundless extent, and infinite variety. As it relates to the conduct of man, it is a moral science of great sublimity; as its object is individual and national happiness, it is, of all others, the most important; as it respects the moral actions of men, and of nations, it is infinitely varied; and as it concerns all his rights and obligations, either derived from, or due to his God, his neighbour, his country, or himself, it must necessarily be a science of vast extent.

David Hoffman, A Course of Legal Study 23 (1846).

There are a handful of law professors in this country who still believe this about the law-- and who have dedicated their careers to exploring the consequences of this sort of belief. We need more law schools-- and there are already several-- that are willing to embrace this exploration for the good of their students and the legal profession.